There are deeper issues behind the rapid changes in the market story that are unlikely to be resolved soon.
James Mackintosh
Senior Markets Columnist, The Wall Street Journal
James Mackintosh joined the WSJ in 2016, after almost 20 years at the Financial Times, most recently as Investment Editor and writer of the Short View column.
He is a graduate of St Catherine's College, Oxford, where he gained a first-class degree in Philosophy and Psychology. He spent two further years at the university in postgraduate study of philosophy before entering the real world. He has two cats and two children.
He is @jmackin2 on Twitter.
Latest Articles
Old fixed-rate loans rank as highly valuable assets after the surge in interest rates.
The hit to demand might come—after much of the fight against rising prices is already over.
*Aside from government debt and the Federal Reserve, that is.
The stock-market correction has plenty of possible explanations—from high interest rates to impending recession—but none are satisfactory on their own.
The past year’s stock-market rally looks more like the tail end of a bull run, rather than the beginning.
The Fed has a new theory—the bond market is doing its job for it, so it can sit back rather than raise rates again this year—but the theory deserves a closer look.
While market moves were initially muted, what should be a concern is the potential for the war to escalate.
Some on Wall Street predict bad times because of an unprecedented drop in the money supply.
Warren Buffett’s visit in the spring highlighted the value of venturing to the country, and stocks are up 20% since March.
Page