What’s Wrong With Peer Review?

A series of high-profile retractions has raised questions about the process used by scientific and medical journals to decide which studies are worthy of publication.

Angie Wang

The latest in a series of high-profile retractions of research papers has people asking: What’s wrong with peer review?

Scientific and medical journals use the peer-review process to decide which studies are worthy of publication. But a string of questionable or allegedly fabricated research has made it into print. The problems were exposed only when outside researchers scrutinized the work and performed a job that many believe is the responsibility of the journals: They checked the data.

Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Continue reading your article with
a WSJ subscription

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Sign In